AI makes dialectics more practical and accessible, by converting any texts into their major theses and antitheses. What requirements does this impose on dialectics as a field?
Shifting from the 'Struggle of Oppositions" to their Unity and Synthesis. Turning enemies into friends, inner suffering into prosperity:
(i) re-defining the "primary/existential dichotomies",
(ii) suggesting how they can complement each other, yielding a "higher quality of existence",
(iii) suggesting how to measure the "success".
Our current success metrics, like money and GDP, fail to capture internal harmony, existential dimensionality and depth, synchronicity, complementarity, resonance, and the desire to live and share happiness. Should we attempt measuring such elusive phenomena like "Indifference" and "Love"? Or shoud we simply re-define the "scientific method", from "what can be reproducibly measured" to "what inspires us to live"?
What exactly does this mean in various fields of philosophy and science?
- Acceptance of the Panpsychism, as the primary fundament for all interpretations?
- Shifting from the "two-body interactions" to the "many-body Sync"?
- Re-defining the SUM: 1+1 = 2+i, where i depends on the "inner qualities of interacting units"?
Any other suggestions of what may the "Modern Dialectics" mean are wellcome here
Potentially Useful Links:
What is Synchronicity (wikipedia)
How order emerges from chaos in SYNC (Steven Strogatz)
The Complementary Nature (J. A. Scott Kelso and David A. Engstrom)
Modern Dialectics
My Dialectical Resources
